Topic | code 264

Home Forums Mooshimeter Support code 264

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #15497 Reply
      James Datesh
      Guest

      Portion of the data log where “264” appears. What does that mean?

      UTC TIME SEC CH1 AMPS DC CH2 VOLT DC`

      1479995086 1.92E-05 7.33E-05
      1479995098 9.62E-06 1.83E-05
      1479995108 2.88E-05 -1.83E-05
      1479995118 9.62E-06 0.00E+00
      1479995135 1.44E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995136 9.62E-06 5.50E-05
      1479995155 9.62E-06 1.83E-05 264
      1479995156 2.88E-05 3.66E-05
      1479995168 -4.81E-06 0.00E+00
      1479995185 2.88E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995186 -6.50E-32 7.33E-05
      1479995205 1.44E-05 0.00E+00 264
      1479995206 -6.50E-32 5.50E-05
      1479995218 2.88E-05 1.83E-05
      1479995235 2.40E-05 7.33E-05 264
      1479995236 1.44E-05 1.83E-05
      1479995255 -6.50E-32 3.66E-05 264
      1479995256 9.62E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995275 4.81E-06 1.83E-05 264
      1479995276 4.81E-06 1.83E-05
      1479995295 -4.81E-06 1.83E-05 264
      1479995296 -6.50E-32 1.83E-05
      1479995308 -6.50E-32 1.83E-05
      1479995325 4.81E-06 0.00E+00 264
      1479995326 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995345 9.62E-06 -5.50E-05 264
      1479995346 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995365 -6.50E-32 5.50E-05 264
      1479995366 -6.50E-32 3.66E-05
      1479995385 4.81E-06 3.66E-05 264
      1479995386 1.44E-05 0.00E+00
      1479995405 -6.50E-32 0.00E+00 264
      1479995406 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995425 1.92E-05 -1.83E-05 264
      1479995426 2.40E-05 5.50E-05
      1479995445 1.92E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995446 1.44E-05 3.66E-05
      1479995465 -1.92E-05 3.66E-05 264
      1479995466 1.92E-05 3.66E-05
      1479995485 2.88E-05 0.00E+00 264
      1479995486 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995505 4.81E-06 5.50E-05 264
      1479995506 9.62E-06 1.83E-05
      1479995525 1.44E-05 0.00E+00 264
      1479995526 9.62E-06 0.00E+00
      1479995545 9.62E-06 1.83E-05 264
      1479995546 9.62E-06 5.50E-05
      1479995565 -6.50E-32 5.50E-05 264
      1479995566 9.62E-06 5.50E-05
      1479995585 9.62E-06 5.50E-05 264
      1479995586 -6.50E-32 1.83E-05
      1479995605 -4.81E-06 1.83E-05 264
      1479995606 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995618 1.92E-05 0.00E+00
      1479995635 9.62E-06 5.50E-05 264
      1479995636 -4.81E-06 -1.83E-05
      1479995655 1.92E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995656 -6.50E-32 -1.83E-05
      1479995675 1.92E-05 3.66E-05 264
      1479995676 9.62E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995695 1.44E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995696 1.44E-05 1.83E-05
      1479995715 1.44E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995716 2.40E-05 -1.83E-05
      1479995735 4.81E-06 5.50E-05 264
      1479995736 2.40E-05 0.00E+00
      1479995755 1.44E-05 0.00E+00 264
      1479995756 4.81E-06 3.66E-05
      1479995775 1.92E-05 -1.83E-05 264
      1479995776 1.44E-05 1.83E-05
      1479995795 1.44E-05 1.83E-05 264
      1479995796 1.44E-05 1.83E-05

    • #15500 Reply
      admin
      Keymaster

      Hi James,

      When the Mooshimeter encounters an error while logging and recovers, it appends a code to the next line in the CSV file so we can figure out what the error was. However to determine exactly what the error is I need to know what version of firmware you’re running. The build number of the firmware is displayed in the scanning screen. If you let me know what the build number is I can give you more specific information about the error :)

      ~James

    • #15535 Reply
      Anonymous
      Guest

      This is the “264” question.

      FW 1477971088

      I have two Mooshimeters. Both were installed on the same piece of equipment at the same time, at different locations. The other one (not this one) had the overheating battery issue arise during the project. Interesting data came from the two.

    • #15537 Reply
      Anonymous
      Guest

      Focusing on the DC volts, and without regard to sign (+ or -), it is apparent that the measurements were at the lowest end of detection

      0.00E+00 0
      1.83E-05 1
      3.66E-05 2
      5.50E-05 3

      The question is this: was the meter actually measuring something? (Did the probes come disconnected?) We do know there were long periods of zero activity in this system so this may have been during one of those “zero” periods.

      That gives some background that might help.

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: code 264
Your information:




This site is protected by reCaptcha and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.